Glacier projections sensitivity to temperature-index model choices and calibration strategies

Abstract The uncertainty of glacier change projections is largely influenced by glacier models. In this study, we focus on temperature-index mass-balance (MB) models and their calibration. Using the Open Global Glacier Model (OGGM), we examine the influence of different surface-type dependent degree...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of Glaciology
Main Authors: Schuster, Lilian, Rounce, David R., Maussion, Fabien
Other Authors: Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, Universität Innsbruck, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/aog.2023.57
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0260305523000575
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/aog.2023.57
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/aog.2023.57 2024-09-15T17:39:51+00:00 Glacier projections sensitivity to temperature-index model choices and calibration strategies Schuster, Lilian Rounce, David R. Maussion, Fabien Horizon 2020 Framework Programme Universität Innsbruck National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Aeronautics and Space Administration Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 2023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/aog.2023.57 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0260305523000575 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Annals of Glaciology page 1-16 ISSN 0260-3055 1727-5644 journal-article 2023 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2023.57 2024-07-10T04:03:43Z Abstract The uncertainty of glacier change projections is largely influenced by glacier models. In this study, we focus on temperature-index mass-balance (MB) models and their calibration. Using the Open Global Glacier Model (OGGM), we examine the influence of different surface-type dependent degree-day factors, temporal climate resolutions (daily, monthly) and downscaling options (temperature lapse rates, temperature and precipitation corrections) for 88 glaciers with in-situ observations. Our findings indicate that higher spatial and temporal resolution observations enhance MB gradient representation due to an improved calibration. The addition of surface-type distinction in the model also improves MB gradients, but the lack of independent observations limits our ability to demonstrate the added value of increased model complexity. Some model choices have systematic effects, for example weaker temperature lapse rates result in smaller projected glaciers. However, we often find counter balancing effects, such as the sensitivity to different degree-day factors for snow, firn and ice, which depends on how the glacier accumulation area ratio changes in the future. Similarly, using daily versus monthly climate data can affect glaciers differently depending on the shifting balance between melt and solid precipitation thresholds. Our study highlights the importance of considering minor model design differences to predict future glacier volumes and runoff accurately. Article in Journal/Newspaper Annals of Glaciology Cambridge University Press Annals of Glaciology 1 16
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
description Abstract The uncertainty of glacier change projections is largely influenced by glacier models. In this study, we focus on temperature-index mass-balance (MB) models and their calibration. Using the Open Global Glacier Model (OGGM), we examine the influence of different surface-type dependent degree-day factors, temporal climate resolutions (daily, monthly) and downscaling options (temperature lapse rates, temperature and precipitation corrections) for 88 glaciers with in-situ observations. Our findings indicate that higher spatial and temporal resolution observations enhance MB gradient representation due to an improved calibration. The addition of surface-type distinction in the model also improves MB gradients, but the lack of independent observations limits our ability to demonstrate the added value of increased model complexity. Some model choices have systematic effects, for example weaker temperature lapse rates result in smaller projected glaciers. However, we often find counter balancing effects, such as the sensitivity to different degree-day factors for snow, firn and ice, which depends on how the glacier accumulation area ratio changes in the future. Similarly, using daily versus monthly climate data can affect glaciers differently depending on the shifting balance between melt and solid precipitation thresholds. Our study highlights the importance of considering minor model design differences to predict future glacier volumes and runoff accurately.
author2 Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Universität Innsbruck
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Schuster, Lilian
Rounce, David R.
Maussion, Fabien
spellingShingle Schuster, Lilian
Rounce, David R.
Maussion, Fabien
Glacier projections sensitivity to temperature-index model choices and calibration strategies
author_facet Schuster, Lilian
Rounce, David R.
Maussion, Fabien
author_sort Schuster, Lilian
title Glacier projections sensitivity to temperature-index model choices and calibration strategies
title_short Glacier projections sensitivity to temperature-index model choices and calibration strategies
title_full Glacier projections sensitivity to temperature-index model choices and calibration strategies
title_fullStr Glacier projections sensitivity to temperature-index model choices and calibration strategies
title_full_unstemmed Glacier projections sensitivity to temperature-index model choices and calibration strategies
title_sort glacier projections sensitivity to temperature-index model choices and calibration strategies
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2023
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/aog.2023.57
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0260305523000575
genre Annals of Glaciology
genre_facet Annals of Glaciology
op_source Annals of Glaciology
page 1-16
ISSN 0260-3055 1727-5644
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2023.57
container_title Annals of Glaciology
container_start_page 1
op_container_end_page 16
_version_ 1810482986998562816