A comparison of automated approaches to extracting englacial-layer geometry from radar data across ice sheets

Abstract Radar surveys across ice sheets typically measure numerous englacial layers that can often be regarded as isochrones. Such layers are valuable for extrapolating age–depth relationships away from ice-core locations, reconstructing palaeoaccumulation variability, and investigating past ice-sh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of Glaciology
Main Authors: Delf, Richard, Schroeder, Dustin M., Curtis, Andrew, Giannopoulos, Antonios, Bingham, Robert G.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/aog.2020.42
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0260305520000427
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/aog.2020.42
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/aog.2020.42 2024-06-09T07:38:30+00:00 A comparison of automated approaches to extracting englacial-layer geometry from radar data across ice sheets Delf, Richard Schroeder, Dustin M. Curtis, Andrew Giannopoulos, Antonios Bingham, Robert G. 2020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/aog.2020.42 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0260305520000427 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Annals of Glaciology volume 61, issue 81, page 234-241 ISSN 0260-3055 1727-5644 journal-article 2020 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2020.42 2024-05-15T13:03:05Z Abstract Radar surveys across ice sheets typically measure numerous englacial layers that can often be regarded as isochrones. Such layers are valuable for extrapolating age–depth relationships away from ice-core locations, reconstructing palaeoaccumulation variability, and investigating past ice-sheet dynamics. However, the use of englacial layers in Antarctica has been hampered by underdeveloped techniques for characterising layer continuity and geometry over large distances, with techniques developed independently and little opportunity for inter-comparison of results. In this paper, we present a methodology to assess the performance of automated layer-tracking and layer-dip-estimation algorithms through their ability to propagate a correct age–depth model. We use this to assess isochrone-tracking techniques applied to two test case datasets, selected from CreSIS MCoRDS data over Antarctica from a range of environments including low-dip, continuous layers and layers with terminations. We find that dip-estimation techniques are generally successful in tracking englacial dip but break down in the upper and lower regions of the ice sheet. The results of testing two previously published layer-tracking algorithms show that further development is required to attain a good constraint of age–depth relationships away from dated ice cores. We recommend that auto-tracking techniques focus on improved linking of picked stratigraphy across signal disruptions to enable accurate determination of the Antarctic-wide age–depth structure. Article in Journal/Newspaper Annals of Glaciology Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica ice core Ice Sheet Cambridge University Press Antarctic The Antarctic Annals of Glaciology 61 81 234 241
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
description Abstract Radar surveys across ice sheets typically measure numerous englacial layers that can often be regarded as isochrones. Such layers are valuable for extrapolating age–depth relationships away from ice-core locations, reconstructing palaeoaccumulation variability, and investigating past ice-sheet dynamics. However, the use of englacial layers in Antarctica has been hampered by underdeveloped techniques for characterising layer continuity and geometry over large distances, with techniques developed independently and little opportunity for inter-comparison of results. In this paper, we present a methodology to assess the performance of automated layer-tracking and layer-dip-estimation algorithms through their ability to propagate a correct age–depth model. We use this to assess isochrone-tracking techniques applied to two test case datasets, selected from CreSIS MCoRDS data over Antarctica from a range of environments including low-dip, continuous layers and layers with terminations. We find that dip-estimation techniques are generally successful in tracking englacial dip but break down in the upper and lower regions of the ice sheet. The results of testing two previously published layer-tracking algorithms show that further development is required to attain a good constraint of age–depth relationships away from dated ice cores. We recommend that auto-tracking techniques focus on improved linking of picked stratigraphy across signal disruptions to enable accurate determination of the Antarctic-wide age–depth structure.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Delf, Richard
Schroeder, Dustin M.
Curtis, Andrew
Giannopoulos, Antonios
Bingham, Robert G.
spellingShingle Delf, Richard
Schroeder, Dustin M.
Curtis, Andrew
Giannopoulos, Antonios
Bingham, Robert G.
A comparison of automated approaches to extracting englacial-layer geometry from radar data across ice sheets
author_facet Delf, Richard
Schroeder, Dustin M.
Curtis, Andrew
Giannopoulos, Antonios
Bingham, Robert G.
author_sort Delf, Richard
title A comparison of automated approaches to extracting englacial-layer geometry from radar data across ice sheets
title_short A comparison of automated approaches to extracting englacial-layer geometry from radar data across ice sheets
title_full A comparison of automated approaches to extracting englacial-layer geometry from radar data across ice sheets
title_fullStr A comparison of automated approaches to extracting englacial-layer geometry from radar data across ice sheets
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of automated approaches to extracting englacial-layer geometry from radar data across ice sheets
title_sort comparison of automated approaches to extracting englacial-layer geometry from radar data across ice sheets
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2020
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/aog.2020.42
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0260305520000427
geographic Antarctic
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
The Antarctic
genre Annals of Glaciology
Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
ice core
Ice Sheet
genre_facet Annals of Glaciology
Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
ice core
Ice Sheet
op_source Annals of Glaciology
volume 61, issue 81, page 234-241
ISSN 0260-3055 1727-5644
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2020.42
container_title Annals of Glaciology
container_volume 61
container_issue 81
container_start_page 234
op_container_end_page 241
_version_ 1801373282494054400