A framework for attenuation method selection evaluated with ice-penetrating radar data at South Pole Lake

Abstract All radar power interpretations require a correction for attenuative losses. Moreover, radar attenuation is a proxy for ice-column properties, such as temperature and chemistry. Prior studies use either paired thermodynamic and conductivity models or the radar data themselves to calculate a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of Glaciology
Main Authors: Hills, Benjamin H., Christianson, Knut, Holschuh, Nicholas
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/aog.2020.32
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0260305520000324
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/aog.2020.32
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/aog.2020.32 2024-09-09T19:00:52+00:00 A framework for attenuation method selection evaluated with ice-penetrating radar data at South Pole Lake Hills, Benjamin H. Christianson, Knut Holschuh, Nicholas 2020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/aog.2020.32 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0260305520000324 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Annals of Glaciology volume 61, issue 81, page 176-187 ISSN 0260-3055 1727-5644 journal-article 2020 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2020.32 2024-08-21T04:03:44Z Abstract All radar power interpretations require a correction for attenuative losses. Moreover, radar attenuation is a proxy for ice-column properties, such as temperature and chemistry. Prior studies use either paired thermodynamic and conductivity models or the radar data themselves to calculate attenuation, but there is no standard method to do so; and, before now, there has been no robust methodological comparison. Here, we develop a framework meant to guide the implementation of empirical attenuation methods based on survey design and regional glaciological conditions. We divide the methods into the three main groups: (1) those that infer attenuation from a single reflector across many traces; (2) those that infer attenuation from multiple reflectors within one trace; and (3) those that infer attenuation by contrasting the measured power from primary and secondary reflections. To assess our framework, we introduce a new ground-based radar survey from South Pole Lake, comparing selected empirical methods to the expected attenuation from a temperature- and chemistry-dependent Arrhenius model. Based on the small surveyed area, lack of a sufficient calibration surface and low reflector relief, the attenuation methods that use multiple reflectors are most suitable at South Pole Lake. Article in Journal/Newspaper Annals of Glaciology South pole Cambridge University Press New Ground ENVELOPE(-55.215,-55.215,49.567,49.567) Pole Lake ENVELOPE(-100.645,-100.645,56.802,56.802) South Pole Annals of Glaciology 61 81 176 187
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
description Abstract All radar power interpretations require a correction for attenuative losses. Moreover, radar attenuation is a proxy for ice-column properties, such as temperature and chemistry. Prior studies use either paired thermodynamic and conductivity models or the radar data themselves to calculate attenuation, but there is no standard method to do so; and, before now, there has been no robust methodological comparison. Here, we develop a framework meant to guide the implementation of empirical attenuation methods based on survey design and regional glaciological conditions. We divide the methods into the three main groups: (1) those that infer attenuation from a single reflector across many traces; (2) those that infer attenuation from multiple reflectors within one trace; and (3) those that infer attenuation by contrasting the measured power from primary and secondary reflections. To assess our framework, we introduce a new ground-based radar survey from South Pole Lake, comparing selected empirical methods to the expected attenuation from a temperature- and chemistry-dependent Arrhenius model. Based on the small surveyed area, lack of a sufficient calibration surface and low reflector relief, the attenuation methods that use multiple reflectors are most suitable at South Pole Lake.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Hills, Benjamin H.
Christianson, Knut
Holschuh, Nicholas
spellingShingle Hills, Benjamin H.
Christianson, Knut
Holschuh, Nicholas
A framework for attenuation method selection evaluated with ice-penetrating radar data at South Pole Lake
author_facet Hills, Benjamin H.
Christianson, Knut
Holschuh, Nicholas
author_sort Hills, Benjamin H.
title A framework for attenuation method selection evaluated with ice-penetrating radar data at South Pole Lake
title_short A framework for attenuation method selection evaluated with ice-penetrating radar data at South Pole Lake
title_full A framework for attenuation method selection evaluated with ice-penetrating radar data at South Pole Lake
title_fullStr A framework for attenuation method selection evaluated with ice-penetrating radar data at South Pole Lake
title_full_unstemmed A framework for attenuation method selection evaluated with ice-penetrating radar data at South Pole Lake
title_sort framework for attenuation method selection evaluated with ice-penetrating radar data at south pole lake
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2020
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/aog.2020.32
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0260305520000324
long_lat ENVELOPE(-55.215,-55.215,49.567,49.567)
ENVELOPE(-100.645,-100.645,56.802,56.802)
geographic New Ground
Pole Lake
South Pole
geographic_facet New Ground
Pole Lake
South Pole
genre Annals of Glaciology
South pole
genre_facet Annals of Glaciology
South pole
op_source Annals of Glaciology
volume 61, issue 81, page 176-187
ISSN 0260-3055 1727-5644
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2020.32
container_title Annals of Glaciology
container_volume 61
container_issue 81
container_start_page 176
op_container_end_page 187
_version_ 1809942477376847872