Conflicting Goals, Ideologies, and Beliefs in the Field

The last two decades have seen a remarkable surge in work in description and documentation of endangered languages, which has required researchers to rethink how they work with indigenous communities. A wealth of literature has sprung up to address the problems and issues of ethical research and how...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Grenoble, Lenore A., Whitecloud, Simone S.
Format: Book Part
Language:unknown
Published: British Academy 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197265765.003.0016
id crbritishacademy:10.5871/bacad/9780197265765.003.0016
record_format openpolar
spelling crbritishacademy:10.5871/bacad/9780197265765.003.0016 2023-12-31T10:07:28+01:00 Conflicting Goals, Ideologies, and Beliefs in the Field Grenoble, Lenore A. Whitecloud, Simone S. 2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197265765.003.0016 unknown British Academy Endangered Languages book-chapter 2014 crbritishacademy https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197265765.003.0016 2023-12-06T15:34:32Z The last two decades have seen a remarkable surge in work in description and documentation of endangered languages, which has required researchers to rethink how they work with indigenous communities. A wealth of literature has sprung up to address the problems and issues of ethical research and how to create true collaborations between the parties involved. Despite this focused attention, and at times genuine efforts to engage community members in research, this chapter argues that there continue to be fundamental differences between many external researchers and community members in terms of the beliefs each holds about the kind of research that should be conducted, and core differences in ideologies about what constitutes valid research methods and findings. The documentation of traditional knowledge of plant use among Inuit communities in Greenland is explored as a case study. Book Part Greenland inuit The British Academy (via Crossref)
institution Open Polar
collection The British Academy (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crbritishacademy
language unknown
description The last two decades have seen a remarkable surge in work in description and documentation of endangered languages, which has required researchers to rethink how they work with indigenous communities. A wealth of literature has sprung up to address the problems and issues of ethical research and how to create true collaborations between the parties involved. Despite this focused attention, and at times genuine efforts to engage community members in research, this chapter argues that there continue to be fundamental differences between many external researchers and community members in terms of the beliefs each holds about the kind of research that should be conducted, and core differences in ideologies about what constitutes valid research methods and findings. The documentation of traditional knowledge of plant use among Inuit communities in Greenland is explored as a case study.
format Book Part
author Grenoble, Lenore A.
Whitecloud, Simone S.
spellingShingle Grenoble, Lenore A.
Whitecloud, Simone S.
Conflicting Goals, Ideologies, and Beliefs in the Field
author_facet Grenoble, Lenore A.
Whitecloud, Simone S.
author_sort Grenoble, Lenore A.
title Conflicting Goals, Ideologies, and Beliefs in the Field
title_short Conflicting Goals, Ideologies, and Beliefs in the Field
title_full Conflicting Goals, Ideologies, and Beliefs in the Field
title_fullStr Conflicting Goals, Ideologies, and Beliefs in the Field
title_full_unstemmed Conflicting Goals, Ideologies, and Beliefs in the Field
title_sort conflicting goals, ideologies, and beliefs in the field
publisher British Academy
publishDate 2014
url http://dx.doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197265765.003.0016
genre Greenland
inuit
genre_facet Greenland
inuit
op_source Endangered Languages
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197265765.003.0016
_version_ 1786839851958534144