Mare Nullius or Mare Suum? Using Ethnography to Debate Rights to Marine Resources in Coastal Sámi Communities of Troms

While legal progress on Indigenous land claims has recently been fostered around the globe, sea claims still lag behind. Since the beginning of colonization, the doctrine of mare nullius declared seas vacant of Indigenous tenure or authority and led to the establishment of sovereign State jurisdicti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Yearbook of Polar Law Online
Main Author: Tsiouvalas, Apostolos
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Brill 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22116427_011010013
https://brill.com/view/journals/yplo/11/1/article-p245_13.xml
https://brill.com/downloadpdf/journals/yplo/11/1/article-p245_13.xml
id crbrillap:10.1163/22116427_011010013
record_format openpolar
spelling crbrillap:10.1163/22116427_011010013 2024-04-07T07:55:44+00:00 Mare Nullius or Mare Suum? Using Ethnography to Debate Rights to Marine Resources in Coastal Sámi Communities of Troms Tsiouvalas, Apostolos 2020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22116427_011010013 https://brill.com/view/journals/yplo/11/1/article-p245_13.xml https://brill.com/downloadpdf/journals/yplo/11/1/article-p245_13.xml unknown Brill The Yearbook of Polar Law Online volume 11, issue 1, page 245-272 ISSN 1876-8814 2211-6427 journal-article 2020 crbrillap https://doi.org/10.1163/22116427_011010013 2024-03-08T00:28:08Z While legal progress on Indigenous land claims has recently been fostered around the globe, sea claims still lag behind. Since the beginning of colonization, the doctrine of mare nullius declared seas vacant of Indigenous tenure or authority and led to the establishment of sovereign State jurisdiction over offshore areas, and more recently to the characterization of the living resources in these waters as accessible for each State’s citizens. In Norway, colonialism was not characterized by transoceanic settlement. The concept of establishing sovereignty in offshore areas attached to the land, however, had the same basis as the European colonies in America or Oceania. In this context, the acknowledgement of the marine living resources in the waters attached to the land as common goods for all Norwegian citizens adversely affected the Coastal Sámi Indigenous peoples, who exclusively and since time immemorial managed the wild marine living resources based on customary systems of marine tenure. Additionally, due to increased regulations over the past few decades, it has become difficult for the Coastal Sámi to continue their traditional way of living. Still, legislation and recommendations on Indigenous participation in marine resource management exist and derive from both Norwegian and international law. However, despite the established legal framework, Coastal Sami participation in marine resource management is often questioned. It has been argued that the most appropriate way to ensure Indigenous inclusion in marine resource management is to look at the reverse side of the coin, exploring Indigenous tenure, legal traditions and knowledge, and accommodate them within State law. This project aims, through ethnographic fieldwork and literature analysis, to discuss the current status of Coastal Sámi fisheries in the communities of Troms County, and illustrate local conceptions of marine resource management among the project participants. Article in Journal/Newspaper sami Yearbook of Polar Law Troms Brill Norway The Yearbook of Polar Law Online 11 1 245 272
institution Open Polar
collection Brill
op_collection_id crbrillap
language unknown
description While legal progress on Indigenous land claims has recently been fostered around the globe, sea claims still lag behind. Since the beginning of colonization, the doctrine of mare nullius declared seas vacant of Indigenous tenure or authority and led to the establishment of sovereign State jurisdiction over offshore areas, and more recently to the characterization of the living resources in these waters as accessible for each State’s citizens. In Norway, colonialism was not characterized by transoceanic settlement. The concept of establishing sovereignty in offshore areas attached to the land, however, had the same basis as the European colonies in America or Oceania. In this context, the acknowledgement of the marine living resources in the waters attached to the land as common goods for all Norwegian citizens adversely affected the Coastal Sámi Indigenous peoples, who exclusively and since time immemorial managed the wild marine living resources based on customary systems of marine tenure. Additionally, due to increased regulations over the past few decades, it has become difficult for the Coastal Sámi to continue their traditional way of living. Still, legislation and recommendations on Indigenous participation in marine resource management exist and derive from both Norwegian and international law. However, despite the established legal framework, Coastal Sami participation in marine resource management is often questioned. It has been argued that the most appropriate way to ensure Indigenous inclusion in marine resource management is to look at the reverse side of the coin, exploring Indigenous tenure, legal traditions and knowledge, and accommodate them within State law. This project aims, through ethnographic fieldwork and literature analysis, to discuss the current status of Coastal Sámi fisheries in the communities of Troms County, and illustrate local conceptions of marine resource management among the project participants.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Tsiouvalas, Apostolos
spellingShingle Tsiouvalas, Apostolos
Mare Nullius or Mare Suum? Using Ethnography to Debate Rights to Marine Resources in Coastal Sámi Communities of Troms
author_facet Tsiouvalas, Apostolos
author_sort Tsiouvalas, Apostolos
title Mare Nullius or Mare Suum? Using Ethnography to Debate Rights to Marine Resources in Coastal Sámi Communities of Troms
title_short Mare Nullius or Mare Suum? Using Ethnography to Debate Rights to Marine Resources in Coastal Sámi Communities of Troms
title_full Mare Nullius or Mare Suum? Using Ethnography to Debate Rights to Marine Resources in Coastal Sámi Communities of Troms
title_fullStr Mare Nullius or Mare Suum? Using Ethnography to Debate Rights to Marine Resources in Coastal Sámi Communities of Troms
title_full_unstemmed Mare Nullius or Mare Suum? Using Ethnography to Debate Rights to Marine Resources in Coastal Sámi Communities of Troms
title_sort mare nullius or mare suum? using ethnography to debate rights to marine resources in coastal sámi communities of troms
publisher Brill
publishDate 2020
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22116427_011010013
https://brill.com/view/journals/yplo/11/1/article-p245_13.xml
https://brill.com/downloadpdf/journals/yplo/11/1/article-p245_13.xml
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre sami
Yearbook of Polar Law
Troms
genre_facet sami
Yearbook of Polar Law
Troms
op_source The Yearbook of Polar Law Online
volume 11, issue 1, page 245-272
ISSN 1876-8814 2211-6427
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1163/22116427_011010013
container_title The Yearbook of Polar Law Online
container_volume 11
container_issue 1
container_start_page 245
op_container_end_page 272
_version_ 1795673139004309504