Finland’s Continuation War (1941–1944): War of Aggression or Defence? War of Alliance or Separate War?

In September 1939, after having included a secret protocol on spheres of influence in the so-called Molotov- Ribbentrop Pact, Germany and the Soviet Union invaded Poland and divided it between themselves. It was not long before the Soviet Union approached Finland by proposing exchanges of certain te...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Baltic Yearbook of International Law Online
Main Author: Hannikainen, Lauri
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Brill 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22115897_01701_006
https://brill.com/view/journals/byio/17/1/article-p77_6.xml
https://brill.com/downloadpdf/journals/byio/17/1/article-p77_6.xml
id crbrillap:10.1163/22115897_01701_006
record_format openpolar
spelling crbrillap:10.1163/22115897_01701_006 2023-05-15T16:59:58+02:00 Finland’s Continuation War (1941–1944): War of Aggression or Defence? War of Alliance or Separate War? Analyzed from the International – Especially Legal – Perspective Hannikainen, Lauri 2020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22115897_01701_006 https://brill.com/view/journals/byio/17/1/article-p77_6.xml https://brill.com/downloadpdf/journals/byio/17/1/article-p77_6.xml unknown Brill Baltic Yearbook of International Law Online volume 17, issue 1, page 77-121 ISSN 1569-6456 2211-5897 journal-article 2020 crbrillap https://doi.org/10.1163/22115897_01701_006 2022-12-11T12:45:52Z In September 1939, after having included a secret protocol on spheres of influence in the so-called Molotov- Ribbentrop Pact, Germany and the Soviet Union invaded Poland and divided it between themselves. It was not long before the Soviet Union approached Finland by proposing exchanges of certain territories: ‘in our national interest we want to have from you certain territories and offer in exchange territories twice as large but in less crucial areas’. Finland, suspicious of Soviet motives, refused – the outcome was the Soviet war of aggression against Finland by the name of the Winter War in 1939–1940. The Soviet Union won this war and compelled Finland to cede several territories – about 10 per cent of Finland’s area. After the Winter War, Finland sought protection from Germany against the Soviet Union and decided to rely on Germany. After Germany attacked the Soviet Union in June 1941, Finland joined the German war effort in the so-called Continuation War and reoccupied the territories lost in the Winter War. Finnish forces did not stop at the old border but occupied Eastern (Soviet) Karelia with a desire eventually to annex it. By that measure, Finland joined as Germany’s ally in its war of aggression against the Soviet Union in violation of international law. In their strong reliance on Germany, the Finnish leaders made some very questionable decisions without listening to warnings from Western States about possible negative consequences. Germany lost its war and so did Finland, which barely avoided entire occupation by the Soviet Army and succeeded in September 1944 in concluding an armistice with the Soviet Union. Finland lost some more territories and was subjected to many obligations and restrictions in the 1947 Paris Peace Treaty, dictated by the Allies. This article analyses, according to the criteria of international law, Finland’s policy shortly prior to and during the Continuation War, especially Finland’s secret dealings with Germany in the months prior to the German attack against the Soviet ... Article in Journal/Newspaper karelia* Brill (via Crossref) Baltic Yearbook of International Law Online 17 1 77 121
institution Open Polar
collection Brill (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crbrillap
language unknown
description In September 1939, after having included a secret protocol on spheres of influence in the so-called Molotov- Ribbentrop Pact, Germany and the Soviet Union invaded Poland and divided it between themselves. It was not long before the Soviet Union approached Finland by proposing exchanges of certain territories: ‘in our national interest we want to have from you certain territories and offer in exchange territories twice as large but in less crucial areas’. Finland, suspicious of Soviet motives, refused – the outcome was the Soviet war of aggression against Finland by the name of the Winter War in 1939–1940. The Soviet Union won this war and compelled Finland to cede several territories – about 10 per cent of Finland’s area. After the Winter War, Finland sought protection from Germany against the Soviet Union and decided to rely on Germany. After Germany attacked the Soviet Union in June 1941, Finland joined the German war effort in the so-called Continuation War and reoccupied the territories lost in the Winter War. Finnish forces did not stop at the old border but occupied Eastern (Soviet) Karelia with a desire eventually to annex it. By that measure, Finland joined as Germany’s ally in its war of aggression against the Soviet Union in violation of international law. In their strong reliance on Germany, the Finnish leaders made some very questionable decisions without listening to warnings from Western States about possible negative consequences. Germany lost its war and so did Finland, which barely avoided entire occupation by the Soviet Army and succeeded in September 1944 in concluding an armistice with the Soviet Union. Finland lost some more territories and was subjected to many obligations and restrictions in the 1947 Paris Peace Treaty, dictated by the Allies. This article analyses, according to the criteria of international law, Finland’s policy shortly prior to and during the Continuation War, especially Finland’s secret dealings with Germany in the months prior to the German attack against the Soviet ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Hannikainen, Lauri
spellingShingle Hannikainen, Lauri
Finland’s Continuation War (1941–1944): War of Aggression or Defence? War of Alliance or Separate War?
author_facet Hannikainen, Lauri
author_sort Hannikainen, Lauri
title Finland’s Continuation War (1941–1944): War of Aggression or Defence? War of Alliance or Separate War?
title_short Finland’s Continuation War (1941–1944): War of Aggression or Defence? War of Alliance or Separate War?
title_full Finland’s Continuation War (1941–1944): War of Aggression or Defence? War of Alliance or Separate War?
title_fullStr Finland’s Continuation War (1941–1944): War of Aggression or Defence? War of Alliance or Separate War?
title_full_unstemmed Finland’s Continuation War (1941–1944): War of Aggression or Defence? War of Alliance or Separate War?
title_sort finland’s continuation war (1941–1944): war of aggression or defence? war of alliance or separate war?
publisher Brill
publishDate 2020
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22115897_01701_006
https://brill.com/view/journals/byio/17/1/article-p77_6.xml
https://brill.com/downloadpdf/journals/byio/17/1/article-p77_6.xml
genre karelia*
genre_facet karelia*
op_source Baltic Yearbook of International Law Online
volume 17, issue 1, page 77-121
ISSN 1569-6456 2211-5897
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1163/22115897_01701_006
container_title Baltic Yearbook of International Law Online
container_volume 17
container_issue 1
container_start_page 77
op_container_end_page 121
_version_ 1766052596725841920