Who Owns the Land? Norway, the Sami and the ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention

In 1986, the International Labour Organization (ILO) started a process aimed at revising its 1957 Indigenous and Tribal Populations Convention (C107). This process was completed in 1989 with the adoption of the Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention (C169). Simultaneously, national legal and polit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Journal on Minority and Group Rights
Main Authors: Vik, Hanne Hagtvedt, Semb, Anne Julie
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Brill 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718115-02004002
https://brill.com/view/journals/ijgr/20/4/article-p517_2.xml
https://data.brill.com/files/journals/15718115_020_04_S002_text.pdf
id crbrillap:10.1163/15718115-02004002
record_format openpolar
spelling crbrillap:10.1163/15718115-02004002 2023-05-15T18:12:22+02:00 Who Owns the Land? Norway, the Sami and the ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention Vik, Hanne Hagtvedt Semb, Anne Julie 2013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718115-02004002 https://brill.com/view/journals/ijgr/20/4/article-p517_2.xml https://data.brill.com/files/journals/15718115_020_04_S002_text.pdf unknown Brill International Journal on Minority and Group Rights volume 20, issue 4, page 517-550 ISSN 1385-4879 1571-8115 Political Science and International Relations Geography, Planning and Development journal-article 2013 crbrillap https://doi.org/10.1163/15718115-02004002 2022-12-11T12:46:41Z In 1986, the International Labour Organization (ILO) started a process aimed at revising its 1957 Indigenous and Tribal Populations Convention (C107). This process was completed in 1989 with the adoption of the Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention (C169). Simultaneously, national legal and political processes in many Western states addressed the rights of their own indigenous populations. These states voted in favour of C169, but only Norway chose to ratify it – indeed, as the first country in the world, in June 1990. This article details the internal political processes within the Norwegian government, to shed light on the significance of the domestic situation in Norway for its support for C169. We find that a low degree of perceived need for domestic changes may enable states to take a leading role in creating new human rights conventions. Furthermore, the participation of government officials in international horizontal and vertical policy networks may shape the policies of their ministries and thereby those of the state. Article in Journal/Newspaper sami Brill (via Crossref) Norway International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 20 4 517 550
institution Open Polar
collection Brill (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crbrillap
language unknown
topic Political Science and International Relations
Geography, Planning and Development
spellingShingle Political Science and International Relations
Geography, Planning and Development
Vik, Hanne Hagtvedt
Semb, Anne Julie
Who Owns the Land? Norway, the Sami and the ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention
topic_facet Political Science and International Relations
Geography, Planning and Development
description In 1986, the International Labour Organization (ILO) started a process aimed at revising its 1957 Indigenous and Tribal Populations Convention (C107). This process was completed in 1989 with the adoption of the Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention (C169). Simultaneously, national legal and political processes in many Western states addressed the rights of their own indigenous populations. These states voted in favour of C169, but only Norway chose to ratify it – indeed, as the first country in the world, in June 1990. This article details the internal political processes within the Norwegian government, to shed light on the significance of the domestic situation in Norway for its support for C169. We find that a low degree of perceived need for domestic changes may enable states to take a leading role in creating new human rights conventions. Furthermore, the participation of government officials in international horizontal and vertical policy networks may shape the policies of their ministries and thereby those of the state.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Vik, Hanne Hagtvedt
Semb, Anne Julie
author_facet Vik, Hanne Hagtvedt
Semb, Anne Julie
author_sort Vik, Hanne Hagtvedt
title Who Owns the Land? Norway, the Sami and the ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention
title_short Who Owns the Land? Norway, the Sami and the ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention
title_full Who Owns the Land? Norway, the Sami and the ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention
title_fullStr Who Owns the Land? Norway, the Sami and the ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention
title_full_unstemmed Who Owns the Land? Norway, the Sami and the ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention
title_sort who owns the land? norway, the sami and the ilo indigenous and tribal peoples convention
publisher Brill
publishDate 2013
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718115-02004002
https://brill.com/view/journals/ijgr/20/4/article-p517_2.xml
https://data.brill.com/files/journals/15718115_020_04_S002_text.pdf
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre sami
genre_facet sami
op_source International Journal on Minority and Group Rights
volume 20, issue 4, page 517-550
ISSN 1385-4879 1571-8115
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1163/15718115-02004002
container_title International Journal on Minority and Group Rights
container_volume 20
container_issue 4
container_start_page 517
op_container_end_page 550
_version_ 1766184917796913152