Dominance relationships in a group of domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris)

We investigated the extent to which dominance relationships, as described for feral dogs and wolves, applied to a group of 24 neutered companion dogs at a dog daycare facility. Similar to other studies of dogs and wolves, we found significant linear dominance hierarchies based on highly unidirection...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Behaviour
Main Authors: Trisko, Rebecca K., Smuts, Barbara B.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Brill 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1568539x-00003249
https://brill.com/view/journals/beh/152/5/article-p677_7.xml
https://data.brill.com/files/journals/1568539x_152_05_s007_text.pdf
id crbrillap:10.1163/1568539x-00003249
record_format openpolar
spelling crbrillap:10.1163/1568539x-00003249 2024-09-15T18:01:19+00:00 Dominance relationships in a group of domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) Trisko, Rebecca K. Smuts, Barbara B. 2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1568539x-00003249 https://brill.com/view/journals/beh/152/5/article-p677_7.xml https://data.brill.com/files/journals/1568539x_152_05_s007_text.pdf unknown Brill Behaviour volume 152, issue 5, page 677-704 ISSN 0005-7959 1568-539X journal-article 2015 crbrillap https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539x-00003249 2024-07-08T04:10:24Z We investigated the extent to which dominance relationships, as described for feral dogs and wolves, applied to a group of 24 neutered companion dogs at a dog daycare facility. Similar to other studies of dogs and wolves, we found significant linear dominance hierarchies based on highly unidirectional displays of submission and aggression. Submission was the most frequent, unidirectional and linear type of agonistic behaviour and, therefore, a better indicator of status than aggression or dominance displays. Aggression was low intensity, consisting mainly of ritualized threats with no physical contact, and conflicts involving physical contact were never injurious. Older dogs out-ranked younger dogs, but size was unrelated to dominance rank. Dominance relationships were more often expressed in same-sex dyads than between males and females. The coverage of dominance relationships in the daycare group was low compared to that reported for sexually intact dogs and wolves, which was probably a result of reduced competition due to neutering and other human influences. In many dyads dogs never exchanged agonistic behaviours, but bi-directional relationships were rare, and most dogs formed some dominance relationships with other dogs. Except for their low coverage, muzzle licks met the criteria for a formal display of submission. Our results suggest that dominance remains a robust component of domestic dog behaviour even when humans significantly reduce the potential for resource competition. The possible proximate benefits of dominance relationships for dogs are discussed. Article in Journal/Newspaper Canis lupus Brill Behaviour 152 5 677 704
institution Open Polar
collection Brill
op_collection_id crbrillap
language unknown
description We investigated the extent to which dominance relationships, as described for feral dogs and wolves, applied to a group of 24 neutered companion dogs at a dog daycare facility. Similar to other studies of dogs and wolves, we found significant linear dominance hierarchies based on highly unidirectional displays of submission and aggression. Submission was the most frequent, unidirectional and linear type of agonistic behaviour and, therefore, a better indicator of status than aggression or dominance displays. Aggression was low intensity, consisting mainly of ritualized threats with no physical contact, and conflicts involving physical contact were never injurious. Older dogs out-ranked younger dogs, but size was unrelated to dominance rank. Dominance relationships were more often expressed in same-sex dyads than between males and females. The coverage of dominance relationships in the daycare group was low compared to that reported for sexually intact dogs and wolves, which was probably a result of reduced competition due to neutering and other human influences. In many dyads dogs never exchanged agonistic behaviours, but bi-directional relationships were rare, and most dogs formed some dominance relationships with other dogs. Except for their low coverage, muzzle licks met the criteria for a formal display of submission. Our results suggest that dominance remains a robust component of domestic dog behaviour even when humans significantly reduce the potential for resource competition. The possible proximate benefits of dominance relationships for dogs are discussed.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Trisko, Rebecca K.
Smuts, Barbara B.
spellingShingle Trisko, Rebecca K.
Smuts, Barbara B.
Dominance relationships in a group of domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris)
author_facet Trisko, Rebecca K.
Smuts, Barbara B.
author_sort Trisko, Rebecca K.
title Dominance relationships in a group of domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris)
title_short Dominance relationships in a group of domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris)
title_full Dominance relationships in a group of domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris)
title_fullStr Dominance relationships in a group of domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris)
title_full_unstemmed Dominance relationships in a group of domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris)
title_sort dominance relationships in a group of domestic dogs (canis lupus familiaris)
publisher Brill
publishDate 2015
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1568539x-00003249
https://brill.com/view/journals/beh/152/5/article-p677_7.xml
https://data.brill.com/files/journals/1568539x_152_05_s007_text.pdf
genre Canis lupus
genre_facet Canis lupus
op_source Behaviour
volume 152, issue 5, page 677-704
ISSN 0005-7959 1568-539X
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539x-00003249
container_title Behaviour
container_volume 152
container_issue 5
container_start_page 677
op_container_end_page 704
_version_ 1810438475031248896