Behavioural synchrony in two species of communally housed captive penguins

Animals in aggregations such as herds, schools, flocks, or colonies tend to synchronize their behaviour with each other for food acquisition and predator detection. Different species of captive penguins, when housed communally, intermingle more than in their natural habitat. Wild penguins typically...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Behaviour
Main Authors: Foerder, Preston, Chodorow, Martin, Moore, Donald E.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Brill 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1568539x-00003100
https://brill.com/view/journals/beh/150/12/article-p1357_2.xml
https://data.brill.com/files/journals/1568539X_150_12_S02_text.pdf
id crbrillap:10.1163/1568539x-00003100
record_format openpolar
spelling crbrillap:10.1163/1568539x-00003100 2023-09-05T13:13:01+02:00 Behavioural synchrony in two species of communally housed captive penguins Foerder, Preston Chodorow, Martin Moore, Donald E. 2013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1568539x-00003100 https://brill.com/view/journals/beh/150/12/article-p1357_2.xml https://data.brill.com/files/journals/1568539X_150_12_S02_text.pdf unknown Brill Behaviour volume 150, issue 12, page 1357-1374 ISSN 0005-7959 1568-539X Behavioral Neuroscience Animal Science and Zoology journal-article 2013 crbrillap https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539x-00003100 2023-08-11T15:02:16Z Animals in aggregations such as herds, schools, flocks, or colonies tend to synchronize their behaviour with each other for food acquisition and predator detection. Different species of captive penguins, when housed communally, intermingle more than in their natural habitat. Wild penguins typically divide themselves into separate colonies by species. We predicted that penguins would synchronize their behaviour more with conspecifics rather than interspecifically in a mixed-species zoo exhibit. The subjects were 65 penguins of two different species, chinstrap ( Pygoscelis antarctica ) and gentoo ( Pygoscelis papua ) in the Central Park Zoo, New York, NY, USA. Using instantaneous scan sampling, 359 video scans were taken over 10 days. Scans were analysed for nine different categories of behaviour for both species. Intra-species synchrony scores were calculated using the Kappa coefficient of agreement, and inter-species synchrony was measured by computing cross-correlations. As predicted, overall synchrony was significantly greater within both species of penguins than for randomly aggregated data representing mixed groups. There was also significantly less synchrony between species than between randomly mixed data for six of the nine behaviour categories. The pattern of results indicates that the penguins had organized by behaviour into separate species-specific colonies within the enclosure. They maintained species separation through behavioural synchrony despite the restrictions imposed by captivity. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctica Pygoscelis antarctica Pygoscelis papua Brill (via Crossref) Behaviour 150 12 1357 1374
institution Open Polar
collection Brill (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crbrillap
language unknown
topic Behavioral Neuroscience
Animal Science and Zoology
spellingShingle Behavioral Neuroscience
Animal Science and Zoology
Foerder, Preston
Chodorow, Martin
Moore, Donald E.
Behavioural synchrony in two species of communally housed captive penguins
topic_facet Behavioral Neuroscience
Animal Science and Zoology
description Animals in aggregations such as herds, schools, flocks, or colonies tend to synchronize their behaviour with each other for food acquisition and predator detection. Different species of captive penguins, when housed communally, intermingle more than in their natural habitat. Wild penguins typically divide themselves into separate colonies by species. We predicted that penguins would synchronize their behaviour more with conspecifics rather than interspecifically in a mixed-species zoo exhibit. The subjects were 65 penguins of two different species, chinstrap ( Pygoscelis antarctica ) and gentoo ( Pygoscelis papua ) in the Central Park Zoo, New York, NY, USA. Using instantaneous scan sampling, 359 video scans were taken over 10 days. Scans were analysed for nine different categories of behaviour for both species. Intra-species synchrony scores were calculated using the Kappa coefficient of agreement, and inter-species synchrony was measured by computing cross-correlations. As predicted, overall synchrony was significantly greater within both species of penguins than for randomly aggregated data representing mixed groups. There was also significantly less synchrony between species than between randomly mixed data for six of the nine behaviour categories. The pattern of results indicates that the penguins had organized by behaviour into separate species-specific colonies within the enclosure. They maintained species separation through behavioural synchrony despite the restrictions imposed by captivity.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Foerder, Preston
Chodorow, Martin
Moore, Donald E.
author_facet Foerder, Preston
Chodorow, Martin
Moore, Donald E.
author_sort Foerder, Preston
title Behavioural synchrony in two species of communally housed captive penguins
title_short Behavioural synchrony in two species of communally housed captive penguins
title_full Behavioural synchrony in two species of communally housed captive penguins
title_fullStr Behavioural synchrony in two species of communally housed captive penguins
title_full_unstemmed Behavioural synchrony in two species of communally housed captive penguins
title_sort behavioural synchrony in two species of communally housed captive penguins
publisher Brill
publishDate 2013
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1568539x-00003100
https://brill.com/view/journals/beh/150/12/article-p1357_2.xml
https://data.brill.com/files/journals/1568539X_150_12_S02_text.pdf
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
Pygoscelis antarctica
Pygoscelis papua
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
Pygoscelis antarctica
Pygoscelis papua
op_source Behaviour
volume 150, issue 12, page 1357-1374
ISSN 0005-7959 1568-539X
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539x-00003100
container_title Behaviour
container_volume 150
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1357
op_container_end_page 1374
_version_ 1776202936559337472