Communication By Agonistic Displays

Abstract 1. Great skuas Stercorarius skua use a range of displays in agonistic interactions in the club areas of their breeding colonies. We examine whether these displays allow reliable prediction of the signaller's future behaviour. 2. Skuas were studied on Noss, Fair Isle and Hoy over 3 seas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Behaviour
Main Authors: Paton, D., Caryl, P.G.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Brill 1986
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853986x00973
https://brill.com/view/journals/beh/98/1-4/article-p213_5.xml
https://brill.com/downloadpdf/journals/beh/98/1-4/article-p213_5.xml
id crbrillap:10.1163/156853986x00973
record_format openpolar
spelling crbrillap:10.1163/156853986x00973 2023-07-02T03:33:47+02:00 Communication By Agonistic Displays Paton, D. Caryl, P.G. 1986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853986x00973 https://brill.com/view/journals/beh/98/1-4/article-p213_5.xml https://brill.com/downloadpdf/journals/beh/98/1-4/article-p213_5.xml unknown Brill Behaviour volume 98, issue 1-4, page 213-239 ISSN 0005-7959 1568-539X Behavioral Neuroscience Animal Science and Zoology journal-article 1986 crbrillap https://doi.org/10.1163/156853986x00973 2023-06-09T14:45:24Z Abstract 1. Great skuas Stercorarius skua use a range of displays in agonistic interactions in the club areas of their breeding colonies. We examine whether these displays allow reliable prediction of the signaller's future behaviour. 2. Skuas were studied on Noss, Fair Isle and Hoy over 3 seasons. Data from 5 colony-year samples were analysed separately. For each interaction, the display used, the signaller's action after displaying, and the receiver's response, were recorded. 3. Attack could be predicted less well than escape. However, variations between samples were so great that neither the absolute nor the relative probabilities of attack or escape could be reliably estimated from the display. 4. The bird that initiated the interaction was more likely to attack or stay, and less likely to escape, than its rival, but the relative probability of attack or escape after different displays was consistent, for birds in the two roles, within a sample. 5. By correlating the responses of the receiver with information about the signaller's future behaviour encoded in its display, it is possible to find whether this information is transferred in the interaction. There was variation between samples in the pattern of correlations, and no consistent evidence of information transfer could be found. 6. The data are discussed in the light of CARYL'S (1979) earlier discussion of models from games theory. The results show that a test of consistency is crucial for any hypothesis about the message carried by a particular display. They indicate that skua displays do not communicate intention in these interactions. Article in Journal/Newspaper Stercorarius skua Brill (via Crossref) Behaviour 98 1-4 213 239
institution Open Polar
collection Brill (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crbrillap
language unknown
topic Behavioral Neuroscience
Animal Science and Zoology
spellingShingle Behavioral Neuroscience
Animal Science and Zoology
Paton, D.
Caryl, P.G.
Communication By Agonistic Displays
topic_facet Behavioral Neuroscience
Animal Science and Zoology
description Abstract 1. Great skuas Stercorarius skua use a range of displays in agonistic interactions in the club areas of their breeding colonies. We examine whether these displays allow reliable prediction of the signaller's future behaviour. 2. Skuas were studied on Noss, Fair Isle and Hoy over 3 seasons. Data from 5 colony-year samples were analysed separately. For each interaction, the display used, the signaller's action after displaying, and the receiver's response, were recorded. 3. Attack could be predicted less well than escape. However, variations between samples were so great that neither the absolute nor the relative probabilities of attack or escape could be reliably estimated from the display. 4. The bird that initiated the interaction was more likely to attack or stay, and less likely to escape, than its rival, but the relative probability of attack or escape after different displays was consistent, for birds in the two roles, within a sample. 5. By correlating the responses of the receiver with information about the signaller's future behaviour encoded in its display, it is possible to find whether this information is transferred in the interaction. There was variation between samples in the pattern of correlations, and no consistent evidence of information transfer could be found. 6. The data are discussed in the light of CARYL'S (1979) earlier discussion of models from games theory. The results show that a test of consistency is crucial for any hypothesis about the message carried by a particular display. They indicate that skua displays do not communicate intention in these interactions.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Paton, D.
Caryl, P.G.
author_facet Paton, D.
Caryl, P.G.
author_sort Paton, D.
title Communication By Agonistic Displays
title_short Communication By Agonistic Displays
title_full Communication By Agonistic Displays
title_fullStr Communication By Agonistic Displays
title_full_unstemmed Communication By Agonistic Displays
title_sort communication by agonistic displays
publisher Brill
publishDate 1986
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853986x00973
https://brill.com/view/journals/beh/98/1-4/article-p213_5.xml
https://brill.com/downloadpdf/journals/beh/98/1-4/article-p213_5.xml
genre Stercorarius skua
genre_facet Stercorarius skua
op_source Behaviour
volume 98, issue 1-4, page 213-239
ISSN 0005-7959 1568-539X
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1163/156853986x00973
container_title Behaviour
container_volume 98
container_issue 1-4
container_start_page 213
op_container_end_page 239
_version_ 1770273880217223168