Merkur on Jung on ethics, mysticism, and religion

• Published in: International Journal of Jungian Studies
• Main Author: Segal, Robert A.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: unknown
• Published: Brill 2018
• Subjects: Applied Psychology; inuit
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19409052.2018.1446505; https://brill.com/view/journals/ijjs/10/2/article-p147_6.xml; https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/19409052.2018.1446505

ABSTRACT In Jung’s Ethics , Dan Merkur, a psychoanalyst in Toronto and the author of many books on the Inuit, psychoanalytic theory, mysticism, and drug-induced religious experience, here writes for the first time on Jungian psychology. Merkur is not abandoning Freud for Jung. A Freudian he remains. But he seeks to contrast Jung positively to Freud. Merkur draws scores of contrasts. Some of them are already known, some not. But even when the contrasts are known, Merkur illuminates them. He is especially concerned with the difference between Freud and Jung on the relationship of psychology to religion. Where Freud seeks to replace religion by psychology, Jung seeks to make psychology itself religious. Whether Jung in fact succeeds in tying psychology so tightly to religion, as Merkur contends, is considered.