Comparison of different procedures for serotyping aquatic birnavirus

The current classification of aquatic birnaviruses is based on seroneutralization assays with polyclonal antibodies. In this study a comparison of several procedures used for serotyping aquatic birnaviruses was made with 10 virus strains (4 reference strains from salmonids and 6 birnaviruses isolate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Main Authors: Novoa, B, Blake, S, Nicholson, B L, Figueras, A
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: American Society for Microbiology 1995
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/aem.61.8.2925-2929.1995
https://journals.asm.org/doi/pdf/10.1128/aem.61.8.2925-2929.1995
id crasmicro:10.1128/aem.61.8.2925-2929.1995
record_format openpolar
spelling crasmicro:10.1128/aem.61.8.2925-2929.1995 2023-11-05T03:44:52+01:00 Comparison of different procedures for serotyping aquatic birnavirus Novoa, B Blake, S Nicholson, B L Figueras, A 1995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/aem.61.8.2925-2929.1995 https://journals.asm.org/doi/pdf/10.1128/aem.61.8.2925-2929.1995 en eng American Society for Microbiology https://journals.asm.org/non-commercial-tdm-license Applied and Environmental Microbiology volume 61, issue 8, page 2925-2929 ISSN 0099-2240 1098-5336 Ecology Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology Food Science Biotechnology journal-article 1995 crasmicro https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.61.8.2925-2929.1995 2023-10-09T16:10:14Z The current classification of aquatic birnaviruses is based on seroneutralization assays with polyclonal antibodies. In this study a comparison of several procedures used for serotyping aquatic birnaviruses was made with 10 virus strains (4 reference strains from salmonids and 6 birnaviruses isolated from turbot [Scophthalmus maximus]). The relationships among the birnavirus strains were studied by seroneutralization assay with polyclonal antibodies and by immunodot assay with both polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies. The results were compared with a presumptive classification obtained from analysis of restriction enzyme patterns of cDNA products obtained by PCR amplification. No correlation was found among the results obtained by the different procedures. The seroneutralization and the immunodot assays with polyclonal antibodies were not useful in classifying these birnaviruses strains; however, patterns of reaction with monoclonal antibodies emphasized the individuality of the strains, particularly in the case of two strains (231 and 460) whose patterns did not correspond to established serotypes. The application of PCR and restriction enzyme analysis is a promising system for approaching the classification of this viral group on the basis of genomic differences and similarities. The variable results obtained in this comparison lead us to think that the current classification of aquatic birnavirus may not be the most accurate and there is a need for modification incorporating recent isolates, not only from salmonid species but also from marine fish. Article in Journal/Newspaper Scophthalmus maximus Turbot ASM Journals (American Society for Microbiology - via Crossref) Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61 8 2925 2929
institution Open Polar
collection ASM Journals (American Society for Microbiology - via Crossref)
op_collection_id crasmicro
language English
topic Ecology
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
Food Science
Biotechnology
spellingShingle Ecology
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
Food Science
Biotechnology
Novoa, B
Blake, S
Nicholson, B L
Figueras, A
Comparison of different procedures for serotyping aquatic birnavirus
topic_facet Ecology
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
Food Science
Biotechnology
description The current classification of aquatic birnaviruses is based on seroneutralization assays with polyclonal antibodies. In this study a comparison of several procedures used for serotyping aquatic birnaviruses was made with 10 virus strains (4 reference strains from salmonids and 6 birnaviruses isolated from turbot [Scophthalmus maximus]). The relationships among the birnavirus strains were studied by seroneutralization assay with polyclonal antibodies and by immunodot assay with both polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies. The results were compared with a presumptive classification obtained from analysis of restriction enzyme patterns of cDNA products obtained by PCR amplification. No correlation was found among the results obtained by the different procedures. The seroneutralization and the immunodot assays with polyclonal antibodies were not useful in classifying these birnaviruses strains; however, patterns of reaction with monoclonal antibodies emphasized the individuality of the strains, particularly in the case of two strains (231 and 460) whose patterns did not correspond to established serotypes. The application of PCR and restriction enzyme analysis is a promising system for approaching the classification of this viral group on the basis of genomic differences and similarities. The variable results obtained in this comparison lead us to think that the current classification of aquatic birnavirus may not be the most accurate and there is a need for modification incorporating recent isolates, not only from salmonid species but also from marine fish.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Novoa, B
Blake, S
Nicholson, B L
Figueras, A
author_facet Novoa, B
Blake, S
Nicholson, B L
Figueras, A
author_sort Novoa, B
title Comparison of different procedures for serotyping aquatic birnavirus
title_short Comparison of different procedures for serotyping aquatic birnavirus
title_full Comparison of different procedures for serotyping aquatic birnavirus
title_fullStr Comparison of different procedures for serotyping aquatic birnavirus
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different procedures for serotyping aquatic birnavirus
title_sort comparison of different procedures for serotyping aquatic birnavirus
publisher American Society for Microbiology
publishDate 1995
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/aem.61.8.2925-2929.1995
https://journals.asm.org/doi/pdf/10.1128/aem.61.8.2925-2929.1995
genre Scophthalmus maximus
Turbot
genre_facet Scophthalmus maximus
Turbot
op_source Applied and Environmental Microbiology
volume 61, issue 8, page 2925-2929
ISSN 0099-2240 1098-5336
op_rights https://journals.asm.org/non-commercial-tdm-license
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.61.8.2925-2929.1995
container_title Applied and Environmental Microbiology
container_volume 61
container_issue 8
container_start_page 2925
op_container_end_page 2929
_version_ 1781705942422781952